Choosing the Best Liquidity Pool Model: Standard or Concentrated?

1. Understanding Liquidity Pools

Before delving into the differences, let's define what a liquidity pool is. A liquidity pool is a smart contract containing two tokens deposited by liquidity providers (LPs). These pools power automated market makers (AMMs), which use mathematical formulas to set token prices based on supply and demand. LPs earn trading fees in return for supplying liquidity, making these pools essential to DeFi ecosystems like Uniswap, PancakeSwap, and others.

2. What are standard Liquidity Pools?

Standard liquidity pools, often referred to as XYK pools or constant product pools, were first pioneered by platforms like Uniswap V2. In this model, liquidity is evenly distributed across the entire price spectrum—from zero to infinity—ensuring that trading is always possible, regardless of price fluctuations.

How They Work:
LPs deposit two tokens in equal value (e.g., ETH and DAI) into the pool. The pool follows the constant product formula, x * y = k, where x and y represent the quantities of the two tokens, and k is a fixed constant. As trades occur, the ratio of tokens adjusts to maintain this balance.

Advantages:

Ease of Use: The simplicity of standard pools makes them accessible to beginners.
Passive Income: LPs don’t need to manage their positions actively; liquidity is always available for trading.
Stable Risk: The broad distribution of liquidity reduces the intensity of impermanent loss (IL)—a temporary loss caused by price volatility—though it doesn’t eliminate it entirely.

Disadvantages:

Low Capital Efficiency: Much of the liquidity sits unused outside typical trading ranges, reducing returns.
Lower Fee Earnings: With capital spread thin, LPs earn smaller fees compared to more efficient models.

3. What are concentrated Liquidity Pools?

Concentrated liquidity pools, introduced by Uniswap V3 in 2021, revolutionized the AMM model by allowing LPs to allocate their funds within specific price ranges. This innovation has been adopted by DEXs like Ambient Finance, Thruster Finance, and others, offering greater control and efficiency for liquidity providers.

How They Work:
Instead of spreading liquidity across all prices, LPs define a price range (e.g., ETH between $1,800 and $2,200). Within this range, their capital is fully utilized, optimizing its effectiveness. If the market price falls outside this range, the liquidity becomes inactive until prices return to the defined range.

Advantages:

Enhanced Capital Efficiency: By concentrating liquidity within a specific range, LPs maximize the use of their funds, earning higher fees with less capital.
Customization: LPs can tailor their positions to align with market predictions or preferred trading ranges.
Higher Returns: When prices stay within the chosen range, LPs capture significantly more trading fees compared to standard pools.

Disadvantages:

Active Management: LPs must monitor and adjust ranges as prices shift, or they risk earning no fees if the price falls outside their selected range.
Increased Impermanent Loss Risk: Narrow ranges increase the risk of IL when prices move outside the selected bounds.
Complexity: This model demands a deeper understanding of market behavior, making it less beginner-friendly.

4. Liquidity Pool Standard vs. Concentrated

To help you make an informed decision, let's break down the core distinctions between standard liquidity pools and concentrated liquidity pools:

Aspect	Standard Liquidity Pools	Concentrated Liquidity Pools
Capital Efficiency	Liquidity is spread across all prices, resulting in lower efficiency.	Liquidity is focused within chosen ranges, optimizing capital use.
Management	Passive—set it and forget it.	Active—requires ongoing oversight and adjustments.
Risk and Reward	Lower risk of significant IL but modest fee earnings.	Higher potential rewards but greater IL risk if prices deviate.
Accessibility	Simple and ideal for novices.	Complex and better suited for experienced traders.
Fee Potential	Consistent but lower fees due to diluted capital.	Higher fees when prices align with the range, but zero when outside it.

5. Which should you choose?

Deciding between standard liquidity pools and concentrated liquidity pools depends on your experience, goals, and risk tolerance. Here’s a guide to help you choose the right model:

Opt for Standard Liquidity Pools If:

You’re new to DeFi and prefer a hassle-free experience.
You want a passive strategy without constant monitoring.
You’re providing liquidity for stablecoin pairs (e.g., USDC/USDT) with minimal price volatility.

Opt for Concentrated Liquidity Pools If:

You’re an advanced user comfortable with active management.
You aim to maximize returns and capital efficiency.
You can predict price trends or are willing to adjust positions as needed.

6. Real-World examples

To provide more context, let's see how these models perform in real-world scenarios:

Standard Liquidity Pool:
On Syncswap, a DEX using the XYK model, LPs in an ETH/USDC pool might earn a steady 8-10% annual yield. This consistency appeals to those who prioritize predictability over high returns, and it is a great option for risk-averse users or those just starting out in DeFi.

Concentrated Liquidity Pool:
On Uniswap V3, an LP concentrating ETH liquidity between $2,000 and $2,500 could see yields ranging from 20% to over 200%, depending on trading volume and price stability. However, if ETH drops to $1,800, their liquidity becomes inactive, halting fee earnings until the price returns to the range.

7. Conclusion

When comparing liquidity pool standard vs. concentrated, there’s no one-size-fits-all answer. Standard pools offer simplicity and stability, making them a great entry point for beginners. Concentrated pools, with their higher efficiency and reward potential, cater to those willing to navigate their complexity. By weighing your priorities—whether ease of use, risk management, or profit potential—you can select the right liquidity pool model to enhance your DeFi journey.

Read more: